Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Indian State Encourages Microsoft Removal

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Aug 30, 2006 03:27 AM
from the another-12,500-bites-the-dust dept.
cultrhetor writes "The New York Times reports that the communist government in the Indian state of Kerala is trying to remove Microsoft from its public institutions, as part of a campaign against monopolistic corporations. From the article: 'schools and public offices across the state are being encouraged to install free software systems instead of purchasing Microsoft's Windows programs. "It is well-known that Microsoft wants to have a monopoly in the field of computer technology. Naturally, being a democratic and progressive government, we want to encourage the spread of free software," M. A. Baby, the state's education minister, said by telephone.' The government is not banning Microsoft, but it is actively encouraging all 12,500 public schools in the state to install Linux."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by asb (1909) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:35AM (#16005533) Homepage
    "Remember, when downloading free software, you're downloading communism."
  • by solferino (100959) <hazchem&gmail,com> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:50AM (#16005587) Homepage
    1. This is a dupe. [slashdot.org]
    2. In the original slashdot story I posted a link to an article on newsforge [newsforge.com] which gives better background context to this decision by the Kerala government. The article has some flaws i.e. "open source guru Richard Stallman", but still makes interesting reading.
  • by fantomas (94850) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:55AM (#16005610)
    Damn commies! damn slashdot for taking this long to give us some really commies to complain about!

    Actually I guess this is gonig to be fun watching people's head spin.. open source good, microsoft bad, but hang on, is communist open source good or bad? Actually Kerala is governed through a parliamentary system of representative democracy [wikipedia.org], they chose their current political leaders, no totalitarian dictators here. They just prefer communist representatives... Sounds like it's not all a bed of roses but it's in pretty good shape for an Indian state by the accounts I've come across (and a damn nice place to visit as a tourist according to several of my friends).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:57AM (#16005619)
    In communist Kerala... Linux installs you

    sorry, had to be done
  • by l3v1 (787564) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @05:18AM (#16005889)
    the communist government in the Indian state of Kerala

    In fact, this decision has nothing to do with the specific government being communist or not, and I welcome this decision, although I have nothing to do with India whatsoever. But, as wonderful western objective journalism rules expect, how nice it is to insert that word in there so as to inflate a latent (or not) hostility right in the beginning towards whatever might come in the following text. Instead of just saying Kerala's state government decided to encourage this and that. These days, I've just become really sensitive to slight (or not so slight) political overtones.
     
  • by kjart (941720) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @05:44AM (#16005965)
    Anyone against Microsoft must be a communist.
  • by jkrise (535370) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @06:56AM (#16006159) Journal
    "the Communist government in India's southern state of Kerala "

    It is a democrtically elected coalition government in Kerala, led by a Communist party. And communism has no bearing on the discussion.

    "The Education Ministry has an annual budget of 40 million rupees, or $1.86 million, to promote computer technology among the one million students"

    One US dollar is about 45 Indian rupees or thereabouts. So, 40 million rupees would be less than a million dollars.

    "Financial, rather than ideological, reasons may be at the root of the state's decision to promote free software."

    Again, not true. People in Kerala have been using computers since the mid '80s actually. The VSSC (Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre) in Trivandrum, the capital of Kerala has lots of Sun graphic workstations supplied by Wipro in the late '80s. Many public sector undertakings, banks and the Railways have been users of Unix based systems for decades now. Many companies in India have realised that it's a total waste of time, money and effort to invest in Microsoft, Oracle and Cisco equipment and their closed-source zero-innovation ideologies for their computing needs.

    The Indian branch of the Free Software Foundation is located in Kerala, again because of the high literacy rates, and the forward-thinking, proud and practical people of Kerala. Even if Windows Vista is released free for all the students in Kerala, they would not be inclined to waste their time.
    • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

      by brpr (826904) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:38AM (#16005542)
      Except that they're not actually banning the use of Microsoft software, just encouraging public institutions not to use it. That's not anything like forcing private citizens to use one or other bit of software.
    • Re:Boo (Score:5, Informative)

      by belmolis (702863) <billposer@alum.mit3.14159.edu minus pi> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:49AM (#16005582) Homepage

      Kerala is ruled by an ELECTED communist government within an overall governmental framework that is not communist. Private enterprise is alive and well in Kerala. Kerala also has the highest literacy rate in India (95%) and a lot of technically skilled people.

      • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Marcion (876801) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:51AM (#16005811) Homepage Journal
        From TFA, "The news will further unsettle foreign investors in this state."

        Interpretation, spin!

        Here is a more balanced and fact-based treatment : http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story. php?content_id=138497 [financialexpress.com]

        The New York times seems to be trying to stir up "Fear, Anxiety and doubt". The government is not "Communist" but democratic socialist, like the UK's ruling party and much of the EU, Latin America and many other places.

        In Kerala, they are replacing one western Operating System (illegal copies of Windows), with another western operating system (legal licences of Linux). After Microsoft went there and demanded lots of money for no source code and no local language support from their dialect, and Richard Stallman went there and offered full source code and a free system that had already been translated into their local dialect.

        Why this should panic investors? Cola is after all very bad for you, why should Indians have to become clones of us fat, sugar-high westerners?

        Kerala has done very well without help from the western elites and will carry on doing so. FUD or no FUD.

        • Re:Boo (Score:4, Insightful)

          by belmolis (702863) <billposer@alum.mit3.14159.edu minus pi> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:16AM (#16005686) Homepage

          And you've missed the point. It isn't just that they are elected, it is also that the overall framework is not communist, so even a government dominated by communists cannot impose a truly communist state. Private property and private enterprise exist in Kerala, which they would not in a communist system, and the state government does not control the economy the way it would in a communist system.

          Even if the reason for the ban on Coke and Pepsi is hostility to large, multinational corporations, that doesn't make Kerala communist. There are lots of Greens, for example, who are certainly not communist, who are hostile to such corporations. There are also other possible reasons for the ban. One is that if they think that the levels of toxic chemicals in Coke and Pepsi products are too high, it makes sense to ban sales entirely, not just in schools. Even if adults aren't at risk (and they may think they are), kids drink soft drinks outside of school.

        • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

          by rsidd (6328) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:17AM (#16005693)
          Explain why they *banned* coke and pepsi...

          Uh, because they contain harmful and dangerous pesticides?

          Now explain why the democratic, free-market US not only bans marijuana (which has never been shown to be harmful or addictive), but even bans forms of hemp that do not contain [nytimes.com] the hallucinogenic substance (THC) in marijuana.

            • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

              by nagora (177841) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @05:34AM (#16005945)
              And banning microsoft was not a health scare.

              Well, they didn't ban Microsoft, and if they did they'd only be making a prudent decision anyway. Microsoft has held back computing in the West for 20 years; why let it hold India back too? Plus, of course, Microsoft embody the anti-capitalist bogyman far better than some communist local government. Capitalism only works when government intervenes to prevent monopolies growing to the point where they can control the market. Once that point is reached capitalism breaks down, which is what all western companies want. The perfect situation for a western company is to have no competition and customers who have to pay whatever you tell them to. Enron in California is the ultimate example of the perfect western company from the point of view of the owners.

              Microsoft would dearly like to be in the same situation as Enron was before it got busted; does your desire to sell your country to the West really go so far as to want that?

              I think you have a very distorted view of exactly how business in the West works and, more importantly, how western businesses view your country. You are a market to be milked, nothing more. The companies involved will happily collude to screw you and your countrymen to the wall. If it means a few Bhopals or the total loss of control of the power generation system, or the sale of all your fresh water to factories resulting in famine in rual areas, then they care not a jot.

              I know this because I live in the west and they have done these things here. Now most of them are illegal, so they are off to suck you dry before you get wise. A few million dollars in bribes to officials can save them billions off their bottom line, so they will do it. Once they own the government, you'll be praying for communists or anyone else to do something about it. Come to Britain and see what it's like to have a government totally controlled by big business. Fraud and corruption are rife while education, health, housing, and employment are collapsing around us and the electorate can do nothing about it because of the gerrymandering that keeps a party with a third of the vote in absolute power with a vast majority in parliament.

              Or go to America, where the entire cabinet is made up of unelected oil company directors. Literally tens of thousands of people have died, and more die every day, because these represetatives of western business that you are so worried about upsetting are pursuing their business agendas using tanks and missiles. They are also supporting Pakistan's development of WMD which may one day be used on you. They are doing these things not because they hate you but because it makes them money. Lots of money. Nothing else matters.

              As for you, to them you are just cheap labour. By undermining the employment market in their home countries, western businesses can use you to increase the gap in wages between the people who produce their products and the massive salaries they award themselves. As long as you depend on the West to build your economy instead of using your own resources you will never be anything more than a well-dressed slave.

              India has natural resources, plenty of people, and a tradition of education and technical skill that a country like America can only dream of. What the hell do you need us for? Get yourself some self-respect and make your own software, your own computers, your own soft drinks; your own future.

    • Re:Boo (Score:5, Informative)

      by Whiney Mac Fanboy (963289) * <whineymacfanboy@gmail.com> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:51AM (#16005595) Homepage Journal
      like the recent ridiculous coke and pepsi ban.

      You're kidding - coke & pepsi were found (by a private lab) to have contained a pesticide called malathion [iol.co.za].

      Is it really communism to want pesticides out of foods?
    • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

      by shreevatsa (845645) <(shreevatsa.slashdot) (at) (gmail.com)> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @03:54AM (#16005605)
      No, it's not a "communist state". It's a state in India (with the same constitution and political system as the rest) whose democratically elected coalition government is led by a party called the "Communist Party of India (Marxist)". Look it up (say here [wikipedia.org]) if you like.
      The ban on Coca-Cola and Pepsi came after an NGO reported dangerously high levels of pesticide [bbc.co.uk] in them, although it is possible that there were other [rediff.com] reasons [countercurrents.org].
      • Re:Boo (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Bert64 (520050) <bert&slashdot,firenzee,com> on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:24AM (#16005716) Homepage
        What gives MS the right to maintain market share and consequently leech money out of india.
        It makes absoloutely no sense for the indian government to use software sold by a foreign corporation when a local company can provide and support an open source based solution. Any profit that local company makes, will ultimately be taxed by the government, as will their staff, so a chunk of the money the government spends comes right back to them. Plus it helps keep jobs locally, and any improvements they make can also be used by other government departments without additional cost to them.
        It makes absoloutely no sense for the indian government to keep giving huge amounts of money to a foreign corporation, when there's a local alternative. Infact, not using the local alternative is pretty irresponsible and harmfull to the local economy.
    • Because of the GPL, it isn't possible for a Linux company to develop the kind of control that Microsoft has.

      • by babbling (952366) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:26AM (#16005727)
        Because of the GPL, it isn't possible for a Linux company to develop the kind of control that Microsoft has.

        Actually, it is. Due to the LGPL being used in most libraries, it is possible for a company to develop proprietary software on top of Linux. For example, if Microsoft had a Linux distribution, they could create MS Office for Linux, which only runs on Microsoft Linux.

        I think the LGPL will eventually turn out to be a huge tactical mistake.
          • by mrvan (973822) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @05:31AM (#16005936)
            I think you're being silly. The whole point is that the OS should be free, which includes my freedom to develop proprietary software if I see fit. It's your choice to buy or donwload my software or not. Making the C library GPL will simply restrict the freedom of people to develop for linux, which will no be beneficial to the platform at all.
    • by babbling (952366) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:19AM (#16005700)
      If Linux starts to take off, you'll see Microsoft themselves start a distribution. I actually find it amazing that they have stuck with Windows. If they used Linux, they would be able to forget about needing to maintain all of the low-level operating system stuff and could put more effort into locking people into their brand of Linux.

      This is something that the Free Software community will need to start thinking about, soon. How do we prevent that from happening?
    • Re:Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by jandersen (462034) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @04:05AM (#16005648)
      And isn't an allegedly democractic nation complaining about what another nation's population has democratically elected, kinda .... hypocritical? Or is it only 'real democracy' when people choose American style, braindead capitalism, even if the population has to be bound, gagged and drugged before they make the 'right' choice?
      • Re:Wait... (Score:5, Funny)

        by suv4x4 (956391) on Wednesday August 30 2006, @05:27AM (#16005918)
        And isn't an allegedly democractic nation complaining about what another nation's population has democratically elected, kinda .... hypocritical?

        What you're missing is, they're stupid and we're much smarter. In fact, everyone abroad is, I noticed, pathetically stupid. After scientific and military analysis, we found out this is due to lack of "smartness" in other countries, which results in truly utter stupidity.

        However we're not egotistical and we've devised a plan to bring our smartness in other countries against their will (since they are too stupid to request it themselves, it's a side effect). As you can assess, it's not about hypocricy at all. It's all about generosity and caring.