Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Colbert New Comic-in-Chief

Posted by Zonk on Mon May 01, 2006 01:31 AM
from the that's-the-word dept.
scottzak writes "Hail to the Chief! Stephen Colbert addressed the White House Correspondents Dinner Saturday (attended by the President, the elite of Washington politics, and the White House Press Corps) and told the truth. Jaws dropped. Eyes popped. The live audience gasped. Scalia laughed his ass off. You want to see a brilliant comic display some real courage? Look no further. Enjoy the reaction shots, and Colbert's audition for Press Secretary job." The BBC covers the act just prior to Mr. Colbert's, where the President and a look-alike took turns making fun of his speaking skills.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Poor Colbert? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by crazyjeremy (857410) * on Monday May 01 2006, @01:34AM (#15235089) Homepage Journal
    I find it odd that the only people in politics that "say it how it is" can be found on the comedy channel. It's almost... funny.

    What's sad is, once he does say it how it is, he loses the room...

    • Re:Poor Colbert? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 01 2006, @01:45AM (#15235128)
      When there's more news content on Colbert/Daily Show than on the evening newscast, which is more dead, journalism or irony?
    • Worth a watch (Score:5, Informative)

      by lightyear4 (852813) on Monday May 01 2006, @01:54AM (#15235151) Homepage
      Oh he didn't entirely lose the room. Far from it, considering the exceptionally dry speakers preceding the Bushes and Colbert. (All praise the invention of fast forward). Colbert's greeting of Scalia, comments regarding Fox, boxing a glacier, DC the mallowmar city, Plame, and Helen-Thomas-the-stalker were all priceless. The interviews of the press corps in their little caves and 'presidential humor - cspan style' segments were great too. By all means watch it if you haven't.
    • by mindaktiviti (630001) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:02AM (#15235178)
      "People are taking their comedians seriously and the politicians as a joke." --Will Rogers. Seems oddly appropriate.
  • by nanop (155318) on Monday May 01 2006, @01:38AM (#15235102)
    Crooks and Liars doesn't have the full footage. Instead, check out the 3 segments on youtube:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcIRXur61II [youtube.com]

    The transcript is also available here:

    http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/30/1441/59811 [dailykos.com]
  • The BBC? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Steve Ballmer's Fat (641246) on Monday May 01 2006, @01:40AM (#15235110)
    WTF? That BBC article was not only pointless, but about three paragraphs long. At least post an article that discusses the topic, like maybe... E&P story [editorandpublisher.com]
  • Cajones (Score:5, Funny)

    by PaulQuinn (171592) on Monday May 01 2006, @01:40AM (#15235113)
    All I could think watching this, with Colbert never wavering, never holding back, never hurrying his words, was this man has balls.

    Big, brassy, get-put-on-a-no-fly-list, cajones.

    And kudos for being kinda funny too.
  • by sheldon (2322) on Monday May 01 2006, @01:46AM (#15235129)
    I gotta give him credit. He stood up there and pointed out failures not just with the administration, but with the Media as a whole.

    Well done.
      • by nick this (22998) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:18AM (#15235228) Journal
        And I'm not sure you got the point of Colbert's monologue. I don't believe he was playing for laughs. I think he saw an opportunity to actually put his money where his mouth was, and took it. You are right. It was out of place for the event, but I think that was exactly the point. Letting everyone laugh comfortably while we prosecute a war in another country without being able to answer a fundamental question like "why did we go to war" wasn't on his agenda. And it shouldn't be. Good for him, I say.

        • by adpowers (153922) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:27AM (#15235253)
          Exactly. You, sir, understand what is going on.

          I think this is Stephen Colbert's Crossfire appearance. Jon Stewart played Crossfire the same way: pointing out all the faults of the people he was with. Stephen Colbert's audience was even more prestigious than Jon Stewart's. I didn't know about this appearance until after it happened (so I download the video last night) and I was amazed that he had the opportunity to chew out the president... right to the presidents face!

          Unfortunately, I think some of the humor was lost on people who didn't realize the character Colbert plays. However, I also think he has made a lot of new fans this weekend.
  • Isn't it funny? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by greg_barton (5551) * <greg_barton&yahoo,com> on Monday May 01 2006, @01:47AM (#15235134) Homepage Journal
    Ain't it funny how Colbert is being ignored? This happened on Saturday. It was a biting, harsh criticism of Bush, to his face, in front of the nation's journalism establishment. Did it make the major news sites? Type "Colbert" into google news [google.com] and see what pops up first thing. [yahoo.com]
    • Re:Isn't it funny? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 01 2006, @02:36AM (#15235277)
      Two reasons its being ignored:

      1. The press is, generally, in Bush's pocket. Part of it is 9/11. Part of it is that war makes news organizations (and their parent companies) money. Its well known the Jack Welch pressured NBC news while he was CEO of GE. I would wager this has continued and expanded. (aside - It really says something about a president who can have such backing in the press and still manage to go down to the thirties in approval rating.)

      2. Colbert skewered the press as much as the president. He called them on not raising a fuss, not making waves. Why would they want to bring attention to their own short-comings?

      "But, listen, let's review the rules. Here's how it works: the president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know - fiction!"

      A real journalist would probably recognize Colbert's performance as the only news-worthy thing to happen during the event. Here Colbert is providing the best politically satirical speech in years (a generation?) right in front of the bubble boy president. Of course, a real journalist would probably not attend these sort of "buddy up to the administration" events. The fourth estate (ideally) should provide a check on those in power.

      P.S. I love Colbert, but whats this doing on slashdot? I guess it is "news that matters" but not in any tech sense AFAICT.
  • It is really worth the watch. Colbert starts about 40 minutes into the video. Get the torrent [isohunt.com] or watch it on youtube (part 1 [youtube.com], part 2 [youtube.com], and part 3). [youtube.com] If you haven't seen the Colbert report - it is quite good. Comedy central has a bunch of videos [comedycentral.com]up - my favorite is the "know a district" ones.

    The Colbert Report is really high quality political humor, like the Daily Show with Jon Stewart - it is funny because so often it is true.
  • by DeadPrez (129998) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:00AM (#15235168) Homepage
    Is that the mainstream press coverage has mostly covered the Bush lookalike and not the pure political embrassment Bush suffered at the hands of Colbert. Perhaps the educated guess for this strange disconnect would be that the press hosts the event and it would be less noteworthy if the President stopped attending.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 01 2006, @02:00AM (#15235172)
    The best part about this is that the funnier and more incisive he gets, the quieter and quietier and quieter the laughter gets.

    Too bad that nobody will hear about this except the people who read Slashdot, the people who watch Comedy Central, and the people who watch C-SPAN on saturday night. In other words, the exact people who are most likely to already agree with what Colbert is saying. Everybody else, well, everybody else will just hear about that part the BBC covered-- you know, the bit where Bush demonstrated what a down-to-earth, wouldn't-you-just-love-to-have-a-beer-with-me kind of guy he was by getting up on stage with a body double and deliberately mispronouncing words.

    Which means Colbert's little song and dance here doesn't really matter. All right, so somebody criticized the president to his face for the first time in four years. (No, Kerry at the 2004 debates doesn't particularly count.) Okay, so what? The 32% who still approve of Bush's job-- who are, after all, the only people who matter-- won't hear about this, and if they hear about it, they won't listen. The 2006 elections still will go to the Republicans, because even if everyone gets pissed off at Mr. Bush, they still won't like the incompetent, spineless democrats any better.

    The Republicans will continue to hold congress after 2006; nobody will ever investigate any of the laws Bush has broken; Bush will quietly leave office in 2008, Iraq will someday eventually get electricity and running water, and talk show hosts and revisionists will nostalgically talk about what a great leader Bush was until nobody remembers him as anything other than a second Reagan. (And how well do you remember the Reagan administration? Yup, that's what I thought.) Nobody will remember that freakish, depressing third half of the Bush presidency where major american cities were destroyed and the President was admitting to impeachable offenses on national television and nobody did anything about it. Everyone will just remember that first, inspiring part of the Bush presidency after september 11, when Bush said that God told him how to lead the country, and everyone believed him.
  • by Hamster Lover (558288) * on Monday May 01 2006, @02:04AM (#15235182) Journal
    Stephen was in great form with such lines as:

    "Wow, what an honor...to sit here, at the same table as my hero, George W Bush. To be this close to the man. I feel like I'm dreaming. Somebody pinch me. You know what? I'm a pretty sound sleeper, that may not be enough. Somebody shoot me in the face...is he really not here tonight?" (in reference to the Vice President) "The one guy that could have helped."

    That killed me. Later:

    "I believe in democracy. I believe that democracy is our greatest export. At least until China figures out a way to stamp it out of plastic for three cents a unit. As a matter of fact, Ambassador Zhou Wenzhong, uh welcome. You're great country makes our Happy Meals possible."

    Huge groan from the crowd on that one.

    He got some huge laughs, but some got no reaction and I can only assume that either those in attendance were brain dead and didn't get it or offended by his frankness. Either way, he was dead on and hilarious.
  • by wh0me (823744) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:08AM (#15235197)

    I'm all for a skewering of authority, whoever happens to be at the helm. But, after viewing the whole video, while some of it has got to make some of the audience decidedly uncomfortable (note the camera cutting to Joe Wilson and his wife Valerie Plame!) I got the feeling that this is de rigeur for this kind of event, simply that we're paying more attentino because it's featured on Slashdot, BoingBoing, and wherever the hell else.

    So, how accurate is that perception?

    Has anyone seen one of these from years past? Even last year, with the war in full swing, there would have been sufficiently biting grist for a ballsy comic. Is older video of these annual press club dinners on C-Span or somewhere else? How biting is that commentary? How was it during Clinton's run? Or Nixon's?

    That's what the 'net is so great for... putting something like this into a very broad context, not just believing that Steven Colbert doing a bang up job here is the first and last time it's ever happened.

    • Re:Funny? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PaulQuinn (171592) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:00AM (#15235171)
      Bush violates the law and constitution. OH SNAP! I'm a "Bush Basher".
      Ignore the fact that Bush violates the law and constitution.

      Kill the messenger, ignore the message. I'm sure those are tomorrows talking points.
    • by _ph1ux_ (216706) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:20AM (#15235236)
      This wasn't about being funny - it was about being, uh, truthinessful.

      He made some brilliant remarks up there - and he held no punches. The "Scott McClellan can say nothing like nobody else" was terrific.

      I hope this inspires more people to have the balls to say what they feel and know about the tyranny that has strangled this nation.
    • by isd_glory (787646) * on Monday May 01 2006, @02:23AM (#15235246)
      "I think this one's going to go down in the history books..."

      25,000 people using bittorrent to download an hour-long C-SPAN special
      That should go down in the history books as "the day that the anti-filesharing lobbies collectively went: WTF??"
    • Re:Liberal Bunk (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Le Marteau (206396) on Monday May 01 2006, @02:40AM (#15235286) Journal
      God Bless George W. Bush. God Bless America.

      Hey, fuckwit, who are YOU to tell God what to do? DEMANDING of God something? The PROPER phrase is, "MAY God bless XXX".

      That is key. Anyone who demands things of God is a shithead. Whenever you see someone saying "God bless" without the proper qualification... well, you can safely discard anything else they have to say, for they are truly spiritually retarded, and are probably nothing more than a drone.