Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Obama's "ZuneGate"

Posted by kdawson on Sun Dec 07, 2008 05:17 AM
from the et-tu-barack dept.
theodp writes "Barack Obama supporters were left shaking their heads after a report surfaced that the president-elect was using a Zune at the gym instead of an iPod. So why would Mac-user Obama be Zune-ing out? Could be one of those special-edition preloaded Zunes that Microsoft bestowed on Democratic National Convention attendees, suggests TechFlash, nixing the idea that the soon-to-be Leader of the Free World would waste time loading Parallels or Boot Camp in OS X just to use a Zune."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • so? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by n3tcat (664243) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:20AM (#26018825) Homepage
    Here in Germany I see more no-name mp3 players than ipod and zune COMBINED. What does it matter if he's an apple or windows guy? It's not linux, so why does it matter?
    • Re:so? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by theaveng (1243528) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:58AM (#26019005)

      You took the words right out of my mouth.

      An MP3 player is an MP3 player - you don't have to use an Ipod. Me, I use an Insignia that I got for free from Best Buy and it works just fine.

        • Re:so? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by BrentH (1154987) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:37AM (#26019193)
          Apart from the fact that iPod bought after summer 2007 can't load Rockbox, there's a bazzilion players out there that play Ogg Vorbis and FLAC right out of the box. If these free codecs are so important to you, why not buy the device that actually already does what you want (and support the kind of manufacturer that actually builds these players)? BTW, the Zune works fine with Songbird, so the Zune can be used natively on any platform.
            • Re:so? (Score:5, Informative)

              by tao (10867) on Sunday December 07 2008, @07:26AM (#26019391) Homepage

              The Samsung YP-U[123] (BTW, don't import one from the US; the US firmware has no support for Ogg Vorbis) devices seems to be quite easy to get hold of all over Europe; I bet you can find that one in Italy as well. But I'd recommend trying to find a Cowon iAudio instead (possibly by ordering it online). Less bugs in the Ogg Vorbis support plus support for Ogg FLAC.

        • Re:so? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by McFadden (809368) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:49AM (#26019257) Homepage
          That doesn't take anything away from the fact that the vast majority of people probably use them to play mp3s and frankly couldn't give a stuff about anything you've just mentioned.
        • Re:so? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by WhatAmIDoingHere (742870) <sexwithanimals@gmail.com> on Sunday December 07 2008, @09:10AM (#26019897) Homepage
          Sometimes you just want to listen to some music while you're working out.

          I thought this was /. not TMZ.
            • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

              What vastly outsells iPods? Last I checked, the iPod brand still had about 85 percent market share.

              Assuming that's true (*), that's almost certainly by market value, not units sold- that is, a £200 iPod Touch counts way more than a £15 no-name player.

              Important perhaps from a business perspective, but from the point of view of what player a given person is likely to be using, definitely misleading in favour of the higher-priced iPod range.

              (*) And even for a market leader it sounds very high; I'm sure the headline figure hides a more complex picture.

          • Re:so? (Score:5, Funny)

            by CRCulver (715279) <crculver@christopherculver.com> on Sunday December 07 2008, @10:39AM (#26020641) Homepage
            A ski mask can be had for $5 if you shop around. Wearing that, you can run by and snatch someone's iPod out of their hands. I just saved you $35.
          • Re:so? (Score:5, Informative)

            by Ambiguous Puzuma (1134017) on Sunday December 07 2008, @12:08PM (#26021401)

            If you don't mind a small "REFURB" engraved in the case, consider something like a refurbished Sandisk Sansa C2xx or E2xx, likely among the cheapest Rockbox compatible players out there. Regardless of what an mp3 player is designed for, if it can run Rockbox (and is not an Archos) it will play Ogg Vorbis and mp3 files, as well as a number of other file formats [rockbox.org]. Woot [woot.com] features players like this often enough that it has become a sort of running joke; if you're patient you might get a good deal there. I got my refurbished 2GB Sansa C250 at Woot for $15 + $5 shipping, then added a 2GB MicroSD card I had picked up elsewhere for around $5.

            Rockbox, on any supported player, allows far more customization than the built-in software. You can even write your own programs (plugins) to run on it, or modify the Rockbox software itself, if you're so inclined. Rockbox is open source.

    • Re:so? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by bobmarleypeople (1077639) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:00AM (#26019023) Homepage Journal
      I can see CNN now
      Our top story tonight... Obama: To Apple or not to Apple, that is the question posed to our team as rumours surface about major Mac user President Obama using a Microsoft Zune to listen to his music. We bring you the detailed analysis after this commercial for iPods.
      .........actually, I can't see that happening. Give us some real news please!
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Exactly, this hardly seems like an issue that matters to the electorate - or more accurately that should matter to the electorate. Maybe we should be more interested in policy?
    • by rhyder128k (1051042) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:39AM (#26019203)
      Perhaps it's just a prop that one of his advisers handed him to make him look hip.
    • Re:so? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Curtman (556920) on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:06AM (#26019547)

      What does it matter if he's an apple or windows guy?

      I am absolutely thrilled that the dumbest thing this president has done so far is use a Microsoft product. Dubya had already planned to blow up half of the world by now.

    • Re:so? (Score:4, Funny)

      by rishistar (662278) on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:07AM (#26019551) Homepage

      He's quite clearly an Apple guy, and like all their fanbois he is a religous zealot, who will do his hardest once president to push to ensure the spirit of the Mac leader does not die. After all, he has pledged to create 2.5 million Jobs - I just hope they've ordered a load of black turtlenexk sweaters for all those clones.

    • More pop culture (Score:4, Insightful)

      by p51d007 (656414) on Sunday December 07 2008, @09:13AM (#26019915)
      Here we go...more pop culture BS! Who gives a rats ass?
      • by trenien (974611) on Sunday December 07 2008, @07:25AM (#26019389)
        Off the top of my head:

        - Because I'd like to avoid shooting my mobile's battery to hell through constant use for music.

        - Because despite the propaganda from various cell phones makers, there's more and more evidence coming out that tends to show it's not very healthy to carry one over you for long stretches of time.

        - Because I'll never again bind myself with another 12/24/36 months contract to have the latest 'ooh, shiny' and I much prefer buying a cheap phone with no strings attached which will last me at least a couple of years. That way I can change provider whenever I feel like it.

        That's thinking about it for a couple of minutes. I'm pretty sure different people could find other reasons easily enough.

        • by ozphx (1061292) on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:22AM (#26019623) Homepage

          Because I'd like to avoid shooting my mobile's battery to hell through constant use for music.

          Considering the battery is there for running a moderate output transmitter, its not surprising that playing music pretty much has bugger all effect on battery life if you are involved in a call a day. (My W350's battery is barely scratched by playing music as opposed to normal standby).

          Because despite the propaganda from various cell phones makers, there's more and more evidence coming out that tends to show it's not very healthy to carry one over you for long stretches of time.

          If you read the GSM spec, you'll find when your phone is idle its transmitter is switched off. It listens to the closest towers, and when it notices its switched area (as in group of towers) it wakes up, notifys the BSC and goes back to sleep. Considering then its mainly a non-transmitting device like an iPod - I doubt the health issues are from anything but hippies. (I mean come on, its got a tiny battery - just how much energy can it deliver to your balls without flattening it? :P)

          Because I'll never again bind myself with another 12/24/36 months contract to have the latest 'ooh, shiny' and I much prefer buying a cheap phone with no strings attached which will last me at least a couple of years. That way I can change provider whenever I feel like it.

          Me too. Thats why I bought outright every phone I have owned.

        • by logicnazi (169418) <logicnazi@[ ]il.com ['gma' in gap]> on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:53AM (#26019785) Homepage

          Well, yes in a certain very distorted sense of the word there is more evidence coming out that carrying a cell phone isn't very healthy, I mean as time passes we do see more studies claiming connections between negative health outcomes and cell phone use. However, we also see more studies disputing this link.

          Could cell phones be somewhat unhealthy? Sure, but there are some careful studies [arstechnica.com] suggesting the opposite and most importantly any theoretical basis for the supposed effect is at best pretty speculative [arstechnica.com].

          First of all ask yourself if you were a cell phone company would it make sense to go out and suppress the science with some organized cover up? For starters given that lots of smart people who have read the research aren't convinced it's likely that your biases as a cell phone exec would virtually guarantee that you didn't believe the health claims. But in that case you would want to fund the most reputable scientists and perform the most respectable study possible rather than funding less influential rent-a-studies. Even if these execs have been convinced of the link by a unpublished stream of compelling evidence the lawsuit against the tobacco companies should have taught them that you shouldn't cover up the science and risk liability when you can just use advertising to associate your product with healthy living in the mind of the public despite the science.

          I mean let's be serious, the idea that the cell phone companies are engaged in some intentional plan to cover up the evidence about cell phone harm just isn't plausible. But while it isn't as sexy we know that publication bias exists and can have a substantial effect. Scientists want to spend their time on papers that will bring recognition, grants and employment not ones that say "we didn't find any statistically significant correlation in the groups we examined." This means we are a lot more likely to hear about data sets showing a link than those that don't. After all 5% of studies should end up with an effect at a 95% significance.

          Moreover, it's hugely difficult to run a randomized trial for this kind of claim meaning that any effect could be nothing more than an unrecognized prior cause. People who use cell phones are far more likely to use a wide range of other products and probably correlates with a ton of genetic and socio-economic factors. Even studies linking which ear people used for their phone to later cancer occurrence aren't definitive. It's certainly plausible that our dominant hemisphere is more active/different and thus runs a greater risk of cancer.

          The truth is that these sort of weak statistical links between an item an ill health effects are frequently wrong and need to be examined carefully. If, as we see in the cell phone study, not only do the studies go both ways but the more careful positive studies show a weaker effect and we lack any firm theoretical foundation for expecting an effect we should conclude it's probably just an artifact of publication bias or common causation.

          Of course given that people are so conviced radiation is evil that they falsely convince themselves it makes them sick [arstechnica.com] I don't expect this kind of reasoned consideration to have much impact on the public at large. However, if you are that afraid of "radiation" you should find another website.

  • In other news... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dreamchaser (49529) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:20AM (#26018827) Homepage Journal

    Obama is said to have been wearing Fruit of the Loom underwear instead of his usual Hanes...

    WTF...*this* is news for nerds? I could care less what any politician uses to listen to his or her music.

    • by Albert Sandberg (315235) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:07AM (#26019067) Homepage

      Yeah, but if it turned out he was listening to c64 sid music, I'd wet my pants ;-)

    • by thesolo (131008) * <slap@fighttheriaa.org> on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:10AM (#26019079) Homepage
      Thank you. Not only is this not "News For Nerds", it's not news, period.

      If the presidential choice of MP3 player seriously matters to you, kill yourself. With all of the problems facing the US and indeed the entire planet, this is the most trivial of matters, and people reporting on it should be ashamed of themselves.

      Next we'll be hearing about Obama getting a hangnail. Just shut up.

      • Right. So obviously nobody has modded your post +5 insightful yet.

        But they should. I mean seriously. Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick. Who cares? In other news, he might wear string underwear, use hugo boss suits and play the banjo in his spare time too... And I still ask myself "who cares?"

        All of these bloggers, newsmen, execs and /. editors ought to get something that at least resembles a life. Really. Seriously.

        It reminds me of a Cake Song:

        Shut the Fuck up

        Ok
        All right
        Oh no
        This one, this one, this one

        Heads of state who ride and wrangle
        Who look at your face from more than one angle
        Can cut you from their bloated budgets
        Like sharpened knives through chicken mcnuggets

        Now, heads of state who ride and wrangle
        Who look at your face from more than one angle
        Can cut you from their bloated budgets
        Like sharpened knives through chicken mcnuggets

        (Shut the fuck) up
        Yo, shut the fuck up
        (Shut the fuck)
        Right, right, learn to buck up
        (Shut the fuck)
        Right, shut the fuck up, hey, ho
        (Shut the fuck)
        Now, now learn to buck up

        (1, 2, a-1, 2, 3, 4!)

        Now, nimble fingers that dance on numbers
        Will eat your children and steal your thunder
        While heavy torsos that heave and hurl
        Will crunch like nuts in the mouths of squirrels

        Now, nimble fingers that dance on numbers
        Will eat your children and steal your thunder
        While heavy torsos that heave and hurl
        Will crunch like nuts in the mouths of squirrels

        (Shut the fuck) up
        Yo, shut the fuck up
        (Shut the fuck)
        Right now learn to buck up
        (Shut the fuck)
        Right, shut the fuck up yeah, ho! Yow!
        (Shut the fuck) Yow! Yow! Yow!
        Learn to buck up

        Now, simple feet that flicker like fire
        And burn like candles in smokey spires
        Do more to turn my joy to sadness
        Than somber thoughts of burning planets

        Now, clever feet that flicker like fire
        And burn like candles in smokey spires
        Do more to turn my joy to sadness
        Than somber thoughts of burning planets

        (Shut the fuck)
        All right
        Ok
        I don't(Shut the fuck) wanna
        I don't wanna hear it that's right
        (Shut the fuck)
        Oh no, ok, I don't wanna
        (Shut the fuck)
        I don't wanna
        (Shut the fuck)
        Yeeaahh, ho, yow!
        (Shut the fuck)
        I don't wanna...I don't wanna...

        Ooooh ooh oooooooh ooh ooooooohhh ooh

  • You guys (Score:5, Funny)

    by sleeponthemic (1253494) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:21AM (#26018829) Homepage
    I will seriously kill myself if he likes Star Wars better than Star Trek.
  • oh my god (Score:5, Funny)

    by papabob (1211684) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:23AM (#26018841)

    He is one of those f*** bastards who use the tool that best fits him (for example being free, if it is really a gift from microsoft) instead of "what he should use"!

    (or better)

    He is one of those f*** bastards who only want to listen mp3 ignoring how stylish is his player!!

    Impeachment now!!

  • God help us. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by msgmonkey (599753) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:24AM (#26018857)

    Maybe he cares more about the music he's listening to rather than the make/model of the player.

    If I did n't have an mp3 player and got a zune for free, as long as it played my mp3s correctly I'd use it. Sometimes I wonder if Apple is a religion or just some company that makes tech products.

    • Re:God help us. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Threni (635302) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:31AM (#26018889)

      Maybe he's found out about how Apple make it impossible to use third party hardware with the iPod classic, or maybe he got one of the crippled EU ones with a volume limiter which precludes the use of a lot of high end headphones. Or maybe he doesn't like the fact many iPods have problems with batteries, or the effort Apple goes to to thwart people's attempts to use their own software or firmware in the Apple so you can't play ogg/flac etc format files. Apple's successes with the iPod are chiefly marketing related, not technological. They're like Microsoft - they adopt other people's work and stick it inside fancy cases. There's no reason why Obama should use Apple instead of Microsoft stuff - it means nothing.

  • by Macthorpe (960048) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:26AM (#26018863) Journal

    I can't believe that some people care more about which MP3 player he uses than what policies he's going to implement.

    Can I get a reality check to aisle S, please?

  • Jesus... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by skam240 (789197) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:31AM (#26018887)

    Holy Christ! Our president to be is using "such and such" as his mp3 player!? Holy Christ! Some one please tell me what popular Hollywood celebrity is dating what Hollywood celebrity right now as well because this is all totally fucking relevant to my life!

  • Great (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:37AM (#26018913)

    As MAC user with a Zune, he will be able to experience the true value of DRM. I hope he'll remember that the next time some DRM lobbyist asks for a favor...

    • Re:Great (Score:5, Insightful)

      by je ne sais quoi (987177) on Sunday December 07 2008, @09:34AM (#26020053)
      Mod parent up! Except for the MAC part instead of Mac (a MAC is a serial number for an internet card, a Mac is a computer), this post is spot on. I have no idea what the DRM on Windows and Zune is, but I hope that he has tried moving some of his files from his iPod to his Zune and discovered iTunes won't let you do it, or he has run afoul of the "this computer is not authorized" crap. Let's also hope that he's the kind of guy who can spot when there something wrong and actually gives a shit.

      I'm pretty sure our current president has had these issues, he's an ipod listener, but I also guess he probably has his staff do everything for him and doesn't really care if his staff have to infringe on copyright while they are working on his behalf or violate the terms of the license to listen to the songs by moving them amongst un-authorized computers.
  • by A12m0v (1315511) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:37AM (#26018915) Journal

    I'm posting to let you all know that I don't care!

  • by 91degrees (207121) on Sunday December 07 2008, @05:44AM (#26018941) Journal
    Can you impeach a president elect? I think we should try!
  • by Spasmodeus (940657) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:00AM (#26019021)
    I have this fantasy in which I am kind of superhero who travels the country tracking down hack reporters who slap the "gate" suffix on anything vaguely resembling a scandal, then jabbing them with a cattle prod until I'm satisfied justice has been served.
  • Soo... (Score:5, Funny)

    by denzacar (181829) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:05AM (#26019057)

    Was it a brown one?

  • Doesn't matter (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tsotha (720379) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:07AM (#26019065)
    I seriously doubt Obama loads his own mp3 player, and that's a good thing. He's got lots to do before his first day on the job, and screwing with computers isn't on the list.
  • This is classic (Score:4, Insightful)

    by JamesRose (1062530) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:17AM (#26019105)

    It's one of those "what a product represents" things. The Zune is immediately uncool at slashdot because Microsoft, newsflash- Microsoft make some decent products. Rated Excellent at cnet- http://reviews.cnet.com/mp3-players/microsoft-zune-120gb-third/4505-6490_7-33259222.html?tag=mncol;lst [cnet.com] . Reality check, this is a good mp3 player that he got free, I'd be concerned if he went out and spent $250 just for a different make.

  • by Tom (822) on Sunday December 07 2008, @07:01AM (#26019321) Homepage Journal

    You guys are all missing the point! The "news, things that matter" part of this isn't that Obama is using a Zune, but that a Zune has actually been seen being used by someone. Happens to be the president-elect, that's just the bonus celebrity factor. But have you ever seen a Zune outside a store? See, now you know why this is news. :-)

  • for the record (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Dolphinzilla (199489) on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:29AM (#26019667) Homepage Journal

    I dont care to know any of the following about Obama's preferences:

    1. Ipod or Zune
    2. Apple or PC
    3. Charmin or Scott
    4. Missionary or Doggy
    5. Chevy or Ford

    Folks get over it - Obama is not the second coming and he's not the Antichrist -

  • by Have Blue (616) on Sunday December 07 2008, @11:02AM (#26020877) Homepage
    The president is smarter than you think. He just wants make his iPod a less attractive target for theft. [hideapod.com]
  • by harlows_monkeys (106428) on Sunday December 07 2008, @11:54AM (#26021287) Homepage

    iTunes Store: millions of songs. Download and keep any song for $1.

    Zune Pass: millions of songs. For a flat rate of $15/month, download as many as you want, for use on up to three Zunes and three computers. Each month, you get to designate 10 of these as permanent. If you cancel your subscription, you keep the ones you designated as permanent, and the rest go away.

    I have two iPods and an iPhone, and I'm sorely tempted to get a Zune for Zune Pass. That's a fantastic deal.

    • by Chrisje (471362) on Sunday December 07 2008, @06:45AM (#26019237)

      As a Dutch citizen I have the perfect freedom to:
      - get abortions
      - do soft drugs of various kinds
      - drink alcohol from the age of 16
      - get serviced by a hooker
      - get euthanasia
      - get married whether I'm gay, bi or straight
      - get divorced
      - speak my mind
      - drink on a sunday
      - have sex in public places so long as it's not visible from the street
      - go where I please (we don't need visa for 99% of the planet)

      None of which are freedoms I've seen Americans enjoy.

      So I second that motion. Obama will be president of the USA. Calling him "Leader of the Free World" pisses me off too since he sure as shit don't rule my country.

      • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 07 2008, @07:45AM (#26019465)

        - get married whether I'm gay, bi or straight

        Americans can get married whether gay, bi or straight... as long as they marry someone of the opposite gender!

        Take that cloggie!

      • by DrFalkyn (102068) on Sunday December 07 2008, @09:47AM (#26020165)

        As a Dutch citizen I have the perfect freedom to: - get abortions

        Legal in the US

        - get serviced by a hooker

        Well you can do that in Nevada. Its not like the Dutch have NO restrictions on prostitution, (no street hookers)

        - get divorced

        You can't get divorced in the US?

        - speak my mind

        We can't do this in the US?

        - drink on a sunday

        WTF? Have you been to the US since 1950? Their are some states that have prohibitions on where/when alcohol can be sold, I don't know of of any state that prohibits consumption in a private residence.

        - go where I please (we don't need visa for 99% of the planet)

        Getting a visa is going to largely depend on the *other* country, not your own.

        • by SigILL (6475) on Sunday December 07 2008, @08:35AM (#26019703) Homepage

          oh yes, maybe you should also think about this: The usa just voted in its first black president, in the netherlands people went nuts when rotterdam recently got its first morrocan born mayor. Dutch tolerance is a myth.

          In the interest of full disclosure: I'm dutch.

          Yeah, I'm afraid you have a point. Dutch tolerance is more a sort of institutionalised indifference.

          However, you must take into account that right up until the 1950's, most Dutch people had only seen foreigners as pictures in a book. Even I at 27 years can recall watching TV in primary school, and half the class starting to scream and yell profanities because the announcer was black.

          That's not an excuse, it's just how it is: people that are "different" are scary. In the Netherlands it used to be the Turkish Dutch, now it's the Moroccan Dutch. In the US it's the gays and potheads.