Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

McCain Picks Gov. Palin As Running Mate

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Fri Aug 29, 2008 02:49 PM
from the the-one-upping-continues dept.
Many readers have written to tell us about McCain's choice of Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as his VP choice. "Palin, 44, a self-described 'hockey mom,' is a conservative first-term governor of Alaska with strong anti-abortion views, a record of reform and fiscal conservatism and an outsider's perspective on Washington. [...] If elected, Palin would be the first woman US vice president, adding another historic element to a presidential race that has been filled with firsts. Obama, 47, is the first black nominee of a major US political party. The choice of a vice president rarely has a major impact on the presidential race. Palin will meet Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in a debate in October."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Bryan_Casto (68979) on Friday August 29 2008, @02:53PM (#24799655)

    Joe Biden: "Governor Palin, I served with Dan Quayle; Dan Quayle was a friend of mine. Governor, you're no Dan Quayle."

  • by linzeal (197905) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:00PM (#24799805) Homepage Journal
    Well she just asked "What exactly does a vice president do?", on CNBC. Um, ok that is scary. This is just a female Dan Quayle that instead of golfing hunts, fishes and wrestles bears. Unfortunately she does none of these things naked.
  • Age (Score:5, Funny)

    by 222 (551054) <stormseeker@gmai[ ]om ['l.c' in gap]> on Friday August 29 2008, @03:59PM (#24801147) Homepage
    Not that this is the basis for my vote, but I'd like to point out that Palin was the Gov. of Alaska, one of the states that McCain is older than. Made me smile, at least ; - )

  • I'm sorry, being a mayor of a town of 9000 doesn't qualify you to be Vice President, especially when the presidential candidate has age and a history of health problems going against him.

    As for governor, Alaska has a population of 670,000, roughly twice the population of the CITY I live in.

    Alaska also does not face the same challenges as other states. They basically don't have many taxes since they get all their wealth from oil, and so they don't have to deal with the budget issues other states have been stuck with. And she's only been governor for 2 years. At least George W. Bush had a lot more experience than that as governor of Texas. Also, they've been getting a huge windfall of revenue whereas most states are struggling to balance their budgets due to the high oil prices. There are no statewide income, sales, property or inheritance or state taxes (some localities have their own local taxes). Palin actually RAISED taxes on the oil companies and limited their exploration and development (which affects everyone else).

    She has no international experience, or for that matter, any national experience.

    Obama had millions of votes for him as a senator, several times the entire population of Alaska. Even as a state senator he represented far more people than she has as a mayor.
    • C'mon, don't be such a downer. We need faith based science to advance our faith based economy!
    • by LWATCDR (28044) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:01PM (#24799831) Homepage Journal

      "when they shamelessly pander to the stupid lobby?
      --"
      You mean like anybody that has pandered to the anti-nuclear lobby?
      Guess what they all do.
      And I have not problem with creationism being taught as long as it is taught as science. So every bad fact they have can be pointed out.

        • by LWATCDR (28044) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:37PM (#24800651) Homepage Journal

          Hey my teacher taught use the theory of spontaneous generation and how it was proven to be not correct.
          The problem is that the many creationist know just enough science that unless you know a lot of science you must take it on "faith" that they are wrong.
          The majority of pro-evolution zealots on slashdot don't have enough science background to disprove a good creationist. Way to often they "believe" what they learned in school.
          Since I do attend church and I am actually pretty good at science I was once invited to a creationist talk.
          They had some very interesting facts but they really didn't understand them.
          One of my favorite was that they found Carbon-14 in diamonds so they couldn't as old as the evolutionist said they where. They really didn't enjoy my lesson on radio active decay and quantum physics.
          But I can tell you this. If you don't know a lot of science then they are totally believable.
          I would bet that a lot of people on Slashdot only believe in evolution because they distrust religious people and not because they actually understand what is wrong with creationism.

    • by HTH NE1 (675604) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:02PM (#24799839)

      The Republican ticket is now complete

      Yeah, I still couldn't get the voice of Darth Vader out of my head for that.

    • by hiryuu (125210) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:10PM (#24800035)

      In addition to that, she's also pretty rabidly pro-life. This is, among other things, a definite carrot toward the more religiously-oriented part of the conservative base - you know, the part that doesn't thing McCain is conservative enough (in the fundamentalist sense) for them...

        • by dpilot (134227) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:11PM (#24801363) Homepage Journal

          >Both sides of the abortion debate are wrong.

          One of the most sensible things ever said about the whole matter. (especially on /.) I said one of the other most sensible things about abortion, when talking to a pro-life friend:"

          "Do you want to forbid abortion, or do you want to stop it?"

          Abortion isn't a hobby, people don't do it for fun. I don't even think people do it lightly - I think most people feel that they are forced into it by circumstances. (Whether or not those feelings are "valid" or not is a different matter.)

          But I think things can be done to address the underlying circumstances that cause people to feel that they need an abortion, and perhaps one of the foremost is to instill in girls the self-esteem that can help in postponing sexual activity. I once heard, "The most important give a father can give his daughter is to love her mother." Model a healthy relationship. We're talking *real* family values, not the fake tripe generally peddled by politicians.

          My biggest fear about overturning Roe v Wade is that people will feel that the job is done, and even start dismantling the things that are in place now, like counseling, adoption assistance, etc. Oh boy, we've written a rule! That'll stop it! Then self-righteous heads will plop back down into the sand.

          • by MightyMartian (840721) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:20PM (#24801565) Journal

            But I think things can be done to address the underlying circumstances that cause people to feel that they need an abortion, and perhaps one of the foremost is to instill in girls the self-esteem that can help in postponing sexual activity. I once heard, "The most important give a father can give his daughter is to love her mother." Model a healthy relationship. We're talking *real* family values, not the fake tripe generally peddled by politicians.

            Yes, because prior to abortion, girls never had sex...

            Oh wait, they did, it's just that prior to the Suffrage Movement, people had no problem marrying off their fourteen year old daughters when they got knocked up, and then just screwing with the math a bit so the product of all that teenage lust looked like it was popped out of the vagina a few months later than it really was.

            That's what I so detest about Fundementalists, they live in this fantasy land that never was. Kids have been fucking for tens of thousands of years (even longer, if you extend "kid" to apply to our more ancient ancestral teenage pregnancy cases). They like to make believe that there was this mythical Christian population that existed prior to 1965 that was virginal and liked sock-hops with chaperones and always got home at 9pm after a real swell time at Pop's.

    • by SengirV (203400) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:10PM (#24800049)

      how can anyone take a candidate seriously when they shamelessly pander to the stupid lobby?

      I don't know, it doesn't seem to bother the Obama supporters.

      Waiting to be modded as a troll while the OP gets modded as informative or interesting. Even though both took shots at the other side.

      No bias to see here.

    • by Hatta (162192) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:18PM (#24800215) Journal

      They all pander to the stupid lobby, it's their biggest constituency. So really, you should be asking "How can anyone take any candidate seriously?" The answer is, you can't unless you're stupid.

      Look at Obama for instance. He couldn't even wait until he was nominated to betray his stated principles and vote for immunity for telecom's who illegally tapped phones. If you expect him, or any other candidate to remain true to his campaign promises, you're part of that stupid lobby.

    • This is so sexist, vpilf.com doesn't have a single picture of Dick Cheney.
      • Well-rounded? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Chmcginn (201645) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:05PM (#24799927) Journal

        What's your problem with students receiving a more well-rounded education on the different views that are out there?

        Just a little something I read about the government not being allowed to outlaw or advance any particular religion. And, yeah, any form of ID? Yup, that's a religious belief, not a scientific one.

        The problem is that, like it or not, evolution touches on an area of belief where science and religion do intersect.

        And for strict biblical literalists, teaching a heliocentric model of the solar system is going against their religion. Are we supposed to teach geocentrism in public schools, as well?

          • Re:Well-rounded? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Chris Burke (6130) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:19PM (#24800239) Homepage

            That's not what the Constitution says. Besides, I learned about different belief systems back in public high school in my world history class. You can't ignore religion and the Constitution doesn't require that it be ignored.

            Yeah, history class, not science class. You want to teach different theologies in history class? Be my guest. I loved learning about all the Abrahamic religions in my high school world history class.

            You want to teach that in science class? Screw you, you're not teaching your religion as though it's science.

      • Re:Creationism (Score:5, Insightful)

        by pluther (647209) <<pluther> <at> <usa.net>> on Friday August 29 2008, @03:10PM (#24800045) Homepage

        What's your problem with students receiving a more well-rounded education on the different views that are out there?

        Because when people talk about presenting "both" sides of an issue, they usually don't mean the "informed" and "uninformed" sides.

        • by rufus t firefly (35399) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:54PM (#24801025) Homepage

          Any discussion on Creationism needs this David Brin quote:

          I find it truly stunning how many people can shrug off stuff like this, preferring instead a tiny, cramped cosmos just 6,000 years old, scheduled to end any-time-now in a scripted stage show. An ancient and immense and ongoing cosmos is so vastly more dramatic and worthy of a majestic Creator. Our brains, capable of exploring His universe, picking up His tools and doing His work, seem destined for much more than cowering in a corner, praying that some of our neighbors will go to hell... - David Brin

      • I think your post almost all by itself demonstrates why the attack on science is so bad. Even though you don't seem like you yourself are a proponent of Creationism, your post shows, in three sentences, three very common fallacies perpetuated by the creationists:

        I don't see anything wrong with teaching the history of humanity's understanding of the planet's origins. For a long time, consensus was that the planet was 6,000 years old. Without learning about creationism, it is harder for students to grasp the extent of the impact that Darwin's On the Origin of Species had on the development of biology.

        1. Evolution has nothing to say one way or another about the planet's origins. It doesn't even address the origins of life. It addresses solely how individual Species might originate.

        2. At the time Darwin published his book, most people generally agreed that the earth was at least a few hundred thousand, possibly millions of years old. The concept of a 6000 year old Earth was introduced by Thomas Aquinas and largely ignored until the 19th century. And even he was simply speculating on the length of time since Adam left the Garden, based on genealogies given in the Bible, not on the age of the entire Earth, and certainly not on the relative age of the universe. Even amongst Christians, a 6000 year old universe didn't become an article of faith until the rise of radio preachers in the 1920s.

        3. Evolution was widely accepted in 1859, when Darwin published his book. What was hotly debated was the mechanism by which species may evolve. The revolutionary idea Darwin put forth was that natural selection alone would be powerful enough to be that mechanism. There were many other theories being put forth at the time.

    • You've got it the wrong way around. It's McCain's camp (and the Rs in general) that have been attacking Obama's lack of experience. With Palin, they're going to need to tone it down in order avoid pot/kettle issues.
        • Re:Good choice (Score:5, Insightful)

          Seeing as if he (McCain) somehow manages to get elected, I give his remaining lifespan a duration somewhere between James Garfield & William Harrison's presidencies. The good news is we'll have our first woman president. The bad news is she has experience leading about 670000 people total (9000 if you just want to go by her mayoral experience), is rabidly pro-life & loves Big Oil. It will be kinda like Bush, but with a vagina.

          And don't bother to rail on me either, I'm voting for Barr. I've given up on the Republicrats, the only thing that will make our leaders stand up & take notice is another political party coming to power & taking it away from them.

        • Re:Good choice (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ThePiMan2003 (676665) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:30PM (#24800483)

          The ability of a VP to become President has to be considered. 9 VP's took over for the president. Out of 43 presidents, that is 20%.

          • by cat_jesus (525334) <cat_jesus@hotmail.com> on Friday August 29 2008, @04:03PM (#24801223)
            I think he's senile now.

            if you subscribe to the Bush doctrine on torture (as McCain now does), then McCain himself was never "tortured" at the Hanoi Hilton and the anti-American statements he made to his captors are, in fact, truthful and accurate intelligence.

            from a comment on a story in the Wash Post.
            • Re:Good choice (Score:5, Informative)

              by spud603 (832173) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:49PM (#24802153)
              Alright, I'll bite.
              Palin's elected office:
              • 4 years in city council
              • 3 years as mayor
              • a little under 2 years as governor

              Obama's elected office:

              • 7 years state senate
              • a little under 4 years in US senate

              Rounding down, that gives Palin 8 years, most of which was at the city level, and Obama 11 years, all of which is at state level or above.

    • Re:Good choice (Score:5, Insightful)

      by bigtoy (170668) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:23PM (#24800327) Homepage Journal

      I am not so sure this is a great political move by McCain.

      One of the things the Democrats have been hammering McCain on is his lack of judgment. I can easily see Palin as another example of poor decision making.

      While selecting a VP as a strategy to win the election is part of the decision tree (going after the disenfranchised Hillary votes), choosing a VP is also about having someone that can step in and do the presidents job competently.

      I have a feeling this is going to backfire.

      • Re:Bad Choice (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Hatta (162192) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:20PM (#24800259) Journal

        I think you overestimate how much the people will care.

      • Re:Bad Choice (Score:5, Informative)

        by ptbarnett (159784) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:25PM (#24800359)

        She tried to get a state trooper fired for divorcing her sister and after that failed, fired his boss for not firing him.

        True, she has been accused of this. But so far, the only people implicated in trying to get this state trooper fired are members of her family and staffers in her office, without her knowledge. The only documentation of any action by her pre-dates when she was elected governor.

        I don't think it's going to get traction, because the state trooper isn't exactly a sympathetic figure. He was suspended for using a stun-gun on his 10-year-old stepson, and is alleged to have threatened Palin's father (among other things).

        Story here, with links to background material: http://www.adn.com/politics/story/468174.html [adn.com]

    • Re:Hahahah (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 29 2008, @03:03PM (#24799887)

      Well, given the title, I am tempted to assume you're joking. But the capacity of Republicans and their supporters for self parody can't be down played. Perhaps you're actually serious. Next you're going to be going on about Palin's experience and readiness to be president in a job that is, as they say, a heart beat away.

      I think that the opposite of your claim is true: McCain is doomed. He just destroyed the "Obama doesn't have the experience to lead" meme. Sure Palin is a hard right social conservative. But she also happens to be an ex-beauty queen with an ethical scandal in Alaska. The social conservatives claim that women should be at home, not running for the Vice Presidency. Of course they're a bit inconsistent on this. I think that you'll find that Palin and her big breasts are a huge liability for McCain. If nothing else, she'll emphasize that he's very old.

      • Re:Hahahah (Score:5, Insightful)

        by BobMcD (601576) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:35PM (#24800591)

        Somehow you're COMPLETELY overlooking the Hillary/Obama race, and I'm honestly shocked you don't see it.

        Hillary/Obama race was often summed up as: First woman or First black man?

        You don't remember that?? Because, at least in my neck of the woods, there are still many who wish it had gone the other way. Many who would rather give the woman thing a go first...

        Now McCain gets to tap into that vibe, and probably shore up at least a few of those voters that would have preferred Hillary over Obama. They didn't really WANT to vote McCain before, but they would have just for the woman factor, and because they have some kind of irrational hatred for Obama. Now they've been handed a reason to want to vote for him, too.

        In short, my grandmother who has voted Democrat for the last 50 or 60 years will now almost certainly vote Republican.

        Genius, really.

        • Re:Hahahah (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Surt (22457) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:47PM (#24800893) Homepage Journal

          You don't remember that?? Because, at least in my neck of the woods, there are still many who wish it had gone the other way. Many who would rather give the woman thing a go first...

          Because they've outgrown misogyny but not racism?

        • Re:Hahahah (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Kingrames (858416) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:00PM (#24801153)

          http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahjlNLo_3TFE&refer=home [bloomberg.com]

          She did not fire that cop for the right reasons. She fired him for the wrong reasons. And you should not encourage that.

        • Re:Hahahah (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Red Flayer (890720) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:04PM (#24801259) Journal

          Ethical scandal? Really? She pushed for the firing of some cop who tazer'd his own nephew, and then threatened the life of his soon-to-be-ex father in law? Seems like a fireable offense to me. Regardless of how she's related to the family.

          The ethical scandal is that she then got the commissioner fired for not doing as she wished. *That* is the big problem... she is, just like the current executive, intolerant of people who are not yes-men.

          I, for one, do not want another my-way-or-the-highway executive, because no person is infallible.

    • by redKrane (672370) on Friday August 29 2008, @03:47PM (#24800891) Homepage
      This is the type of shit that pisses me off. Very, very few of us "blacks" are 100% African anymore. Being black in America is not a position to which one ascends, it is a position to which we have been assigned due to not being white. If you removed all the blacks who have any Anglo heritage from the US you would be left with immigrants fresh from some African country. I can't even find the words to express how sad ignorant statements like these make me.
    • by jjohnson (62583) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:11PM (#24801349) Homepage

      McCain very effectively put the experience issue to rest by picking Palin, which makes you wonder what the last month of crap from him and his surrogates was about. Obama as celebrity? Palin has actually won beauty contests. Obama passes legislation with his name on it in the U.S. Senate; Palin governs a state with less population than Austin, TX. Palin is also a creationist, arguing for equal time in science class.

      Magoo very effectively hijacked the media cycle with this choice, but one wonders why he didn't choose from a legion of much more qualified, experienced, effective female Republicans.

    • by indros13 (531405) * on Friday August 29 2008, @04:13PM (#24801397) Homepage Journal

      We dont know what Obama stands for except that he for the most socialist policy that i have ever read...coming just shy to that of marxism.

      Yeah, Obama was totally promoting all sorts of government and worker ownership of the means of production last night. Right after he did the crowd surfing.

      Read a book [wikipedia.org] before you rant. And perhaps a reference on Obama's economic policy [barackobama.com], too.

      *sigh*

    • by jjohnson (62583) on Friday August 29 2008, @04:14PM (#24801411) Homepage

      I hear crickets from the Dems with respect to Rep William Jefferson (of New Orleans) and the $100K found in his freezer, etc...

      When the story broke, he was stripped of all committee assignments and asked to resign, which he refused to do. What more do you want, Nancy Pelosi to spike him in the eye with a high heel?